Document Intelligence & Human Review
Turns high-volume business documents into checked, structured data — and routes only the uncertain fields to a human reviewer.
AI Systems
These are not chat interfaces bolted onto a website. Each one sits inside an operational path — a document queue, a sales pipeline, an approval chain, a messaging inbox — where the output has to be checkable and the failure mode has to be safe.
The names below are ones I gave to my own builds so each system can be discussed as a product rather than as a category. None of them is a company, and none has customers or usage figures attached to it — the category sits under every name, and the work type is on every card.
How these are built
They are the difference between a demo that impresses and a system a team keeps switched on after the first month.
Model output lands in a schema with field-level confidence and a provenance reference. A string that has to be parsed downstream is a bug waiting for a malformed document.
Thresholds decide what auto-processes, what a human reviews and what is rejected. A confidence number nothing acts on is decoration.
Where the evidence does not support an answer, the system says so and escalates. One confidently wrong output costs more trust than ten honest refusals.
Corrections are appended rather than overwriting, so there is a record of what the model said, what a person changed, and when.
A labelled set built from the client’s own documents, run on every prompt or pipeline change. Without it, an improvement is an opinion.
Per-request cost and response time are designed constraints, because a pipeline that is correct and unaffordable does not ship.
AI engagement
Send the process and a sample of the documents or records involved. You will get an honest read on whether a model helps, where it would need a human in the loop, and what it would cost per request.